Swiggy vs Zomato Q1: Eternal, Blinkit outperform as Swiggy’s net loss doubles to Rs 1,197 crore

Swiggy vs Zomato Q1: Eternal, Blinkit outperform as Swiggy’s net loss doubles to Rs 1,197 crore

Swiggy Platforms Ltd. on Thursday reported a sharp uptick in losses for the April-June quarter of FY26, posting a consolidated net loss of Rs 1,197 crore, nearly double the Rs 611 crore loss recorded a year ago. Its shares slumped nearly 4 per cent the next day (Friday) and continued to trade about 36 per cent below their 52-week high, reflecting investor disappointment amid intensifying competition in the food delivery and quick commerce space.

In contrast, Eternal’s parent company, the owner of Zomato and quick commerce brand Blinkit, delivered comparatively better results.

Eternal reported a positive net profit of Rs 25 crore, despite a 42 per cent year-on-year drop in adjusted EBITDA to Rs 172 crore. This demonstrated greater operational resilience and efficiency relative to Swiggy.

Topline Growth

Both companies witnessed a significant growth in demand. Swiggy’s gross order value in its B2C business climbed 45 per cent YoY to Rs 14,797 crore, and total revenue surged 54 per cent YoY to Rs 4,961 crore. Meanwhile, Eternal’s B2C net order value rose 55 per cent to Rs 20,183 crore, driving a 70 per cent jump in consolidated revenue to Rs 7,167 crore.

Quick Commerce

Blinkit recorded a net order value increase of 127 per cent YoY to Rs 9,203 crore, surpassing Swiggy’s quick commerce arm, Instamart, which saw 108 per cent YoY growth to Rs 5,655 crore. Blinkit added 243 new dark stores, totaling 1,544, compared to Instamart’s 45 additions, bringing its count to 1,062. This dominance in rapid delivery infrastructure reinforces Eternal’s edge in quick commerce.

Profitability Canvas

Profitability Canvas
Eternal reported net profit despite dwindling EBITDA, while Swiggy’s loss mounted. Swiggy reported an operating loss of Rs 813 crore versus Rs 348 crore last year, a result of deep investment in Instamart and logistics.

Eternal also indicated its optimism by aiming for 2,000 Blinkit dark stores by December 2025, hoping expenses to normalize over time.

Conversely, Swiggy is still exposed to increasing losses as investments in quick commerce keep flowing. 

Investor Takeaway

As Swiggy keeps spending big on expanding quick commerce, margin pressures and increasing losses have taken a toll on its shares. Eternal (Zomato + Blinkit), while under stress, has more control over operations and is progressing strategically on infrastructure.

Investors following the space should keep an eye on the important levers in the future: order value expansion, dark store expansion, and EBITDA recovery path. Cost rationalisation efforts, earnings commentary, and competitive positioning within rapid commerce continue to be critical for both companies.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *